![]() There are "computer moves" which stand out vs human players. Hope that helps a bit! So no, there is no very analytical thing, which does mean we need to be a bit careful and leave the option open that Niemann maybe just really liked this move on general grounds, got lucky it worked, and has learned of his previous mistakes. that's so many red flags it would make the CCP proud. None of this is hard evidence, but they are red flags, and if you add that Niemann has been caught before in online chess. ![]() Hans Niemann did both of this (too fast and too good) and then after the game was not really able to explain his thought process afterwards. In Online chess, they often use this to grade your moves, and flag you if you go over certain thresholds, especially if you have a lower "rating". So playing too perfect and playing too fast in critical positions are both red flags. A computer doesn't see it that way and might spot "instantly" that this move wins material 7 moves down the road, where even a World Champion will check his analysis before playing that. If you play a move with big consequences (say sacrificing material, or violating a principle) you would generally think longer. ![]() A player like Niemann is not really expected to reach that level in a game like this.Ī second point is how much time you spend on each move. In less complex games (like an endgame with fewer pieces) top-10 players can definitely play 20 perfect moves in a row, in an attacking game that's harder. Not a member of this forum, but wanted to help a bit here.įirst off, computers are (especially in complex positions) ridiculously stronger than humans, like your average family car can't keep up with a Ferrari. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |